In this paper, Eisenhart studies how organizations make fast strategic decisions and argues for why fast decisions are better for organizations. She establishes the following:
1) Fast decision-makers use more, not less information
2) Fast decision-makers develop more alternatives
3) Centralized decision-making is not necessarily fast
4) Layered advice emphasizing advice from experienced counselors is fast
5) Conflict resolution is critical to decision speed moreso than conflicts themselves
6) Integrations among strategic decisions and between strategy and tactics speeds the process.
Overall, faster decisions lead to better performance. By helping to promoting good patterns of interaction and creating an environment in which it’s easier to overcome psychological and emotional barriers to effective decision making.
As for links to my project, the anecdotes in this paper about how strategic decisions are made are useful, particularly the areas discussing the importance of immersion in real time information and the emphasis on real time communication. To me, that suggests that decision makers should spend at least some time observing users and adding access to qualitative data to the quantitative data sources mentioned in the paper.